WebOct 25, 2016 · 2.15 The rules of court confirm that certain restrictions expressed in The Siskina [1979] AC 210 do not apply in this jurisdiction. First, the Court may make a freezing order before a cause of action has accrued (a "prospective" cause of action). Secondly, the Court may make a free-standing freezing order in aid of foreign proceedings in ... WebHe submits that the familiar statement by Lord Diplock in Siskina (Owners of Cargo Lately Laden on Board) v Distos Compania Naviera SA [1979] AC 210 at 256 continues to be good law and that it governs the present case. Lord Diplock considered .....

Hunting the Chimera–the end of O

Web9. The UCPR confirm that certain restrictions expressed in The Siskina [1979] AC 210 do not apply in this jurisdiction. First, the Court may make a freezing order before a cause of action has accrued (a ‘prospective’ cause of action). Second, the Court may make a free-standing freezing order in aid of foreign proceedings WebIt will be interesting to see the effect in Jersey - Jersey has had free-standing freezers since 1994 - but the Royal Court also later expressly declined to… swatch women\u0027s watches sale

Out in the cold: how a victim can prevent dissipation of ... - Lexology

WebThe Siskina [1979] AC 210, inter alia, the Bermuda Court also held that where a foreign judgment against the Respondent could not be directly enforced in the domestic jurisdiction, it was necessary for the Applicant seeking injunctive relief to issue WebIn The Siskina [1979] AC 210, the House of Lords considered whether a freezing injunction granted by the English High Court could be served out of the jurisdiction on a foreign … WebThe rule in O’Reilly u Mackman is well known. As a result of Lord Diplock’s speech in that case, the scope of the application for judicial review procedure under s 31 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 and RSC Ord 53, has been dominated by attempts to distinguish between public and private law. swatch white watch